Nested lists doesn't work in many ways.
The result:
- Line one
- Line two
- Line three
The code:
~1) Line one
~2) Line two
~3) Line three
Seems to work, right? Take the extended test:
The result:
- Line one
- Line two
- Line three
- Line four
- Line five
- Line six
- Line seven
- Line eight
- Line nine
- Line ten
The code:
~1) Line one
~2) Line two
~3) Line three
~4) Line four
~5) Line five
~6) Line six
~7) Line seven
~8) Line eight
~9) Line nine
~10) Line ten
Great.. works nice, now for letters:
The result:
- Line one
- Line two
- Line three
- Line four
- Line five
- Line six
- Line seven
- Line eight
- Line nine
- Line ten... oh, right.
The code:
~a) Line one
~b) Line two
~c) Line three
~d) Line four
~e) Line five
~f) Line six
~g) Line seven
~h) Line eight
~i) Line nine
~j) Line ten... oh, right.
When
i is encountered, this is thought of as a new list with roman numerals. Then the next item is the first in a new alphabetized list.
One usage would be to enable lists started at a given count- this should have a different markup than juts
~e) since the inability to differentiate between alphabetical
i and roman numeral
i.